Performance, Range, and Efficiency Trends Across Major Manufacturers
Source: EV Database 2025 Electric Vehicle Specifications
Total Vehicles: 612 electric vehicle models
Data Attributes: Top speed, battery capacity, range, acceleration, efficiency, charging power, drivetrain type
Manufacturers: Tesla, BMW, Audi, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Kia, Polestar, Porsche, BYD, and 30+ others
| Brand | Model | Top Speed (km/h) |
Battery (kWh) |
Range (km) |
0-100 km/h (sec) |
Efficiency (Wh/km) |
Fast Charge (kW) |
Drivetrain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche | Taycan Turbo GT | 290 | 97.0 | 475 | 2.3 | 184 | 281 | AWD |
| Porsche | Taycan Turbo GT Weissach | 305 | 97.0 | 475 | 2.2 | 180 | 281 | AWD |
| Maserati | GranTurismo Folgore | 325 | 83.0 | 420 | 2.7 | 182 | 217 | AWD |
| Tesla | Model 3 Performance | 262 | 75.0 | 490 | 3.2 | 142 | 124 | AWD |
| Tesla | Model S Plaid | 282 | 95.0 | 560 | 2.3 | 158 | 140 | AWD |
| Tesla | Model X Plaid | 262 | 95.0 | 465 | 2.7 | 180 | 140 | AWD |
| Lucid | Air Grand Touring | 270 | 112.0 | 665 | 3.0 | 143 | 184 | AWD |
| Lucid | Air Pure RWD | 200 | 92.0 | 565 | 4.7 | 130 | 160 | RWD |
| Mercedes-Benz | EQS 450+ | 210 | 118.0 | 685 | 6.2 | 173 | 160 | RWD |
| Mercedes-Benz | EQS 580 4MATIC | 210 | 118.0 | 640 | 4.4 | 180 | 160 | AWD |
| BMW | i4 M50 | 225 | 81.3 | 450 | 3.9 | 197 | 131 | AWD |
| BMW | i4 eDrive40 | 190 | 81.3 | 515 | 5.6 | 174 | 131 | RWD |
| BMW | i7 xDrive60 | 240 | 101.7 | 510 | 4.7 | 172 | 159 | AWD |
| Audi | e-tron GT quattro | 245 | 97.0 | 540 | 4.0 | 169 | 281 | AWD |
| Audi | Q6 e-tron quattro | 210 | 94.9 | 480 | 5.9 | 176 | 200 | AWD |
| Hyundai | IONIQ 6 Long Range 2WD | 185 | 74.0 | 495 | 7.4 | 136 | 200 | RWD |
| Hyundai | IONIQ 5 N | 260 | 80.0 | 390 | 3.4 | 179 | 205 | AWD |
| Kia | EV6 Long Range 2WD | 185 | 80.0 | 455 | 7.3 | 143 | 205 | RWD |
| Kia | EV6 GT | 260 | 80.0 | 385 | 3.5 | 178 | 205 | AWD |
| Volkswagen | ID.7 Pro S | 180 | 86.0 | 525 | 6.6 | 133 | 145 | RWD |
| Volkswagen | ID.4 Pro | 180 | 77.0 | 445 | 6.7 | 149 | 120 | RWD |
| Polestar | 3 Long Range Dual motor | 210 | 107.0 | 515 | 5.0 | 183 | 150 | AWD |
| Polestar | 2 Long Range Single Motor | 205 | 79.0 | 475 | 6.2 | 130 | 125 | RWD |
| BYD | SEAL 82.5 kWh RWD Design | 180 | 82.5 | 480 | 5.9 | 145 | 100 | RWD |
| BYD | ATTO 3 | 160 | 60.5 | 340 | 7.3 | 144 | 75 | FWD |
Showing 25 representative vehicles from 612 total records. Highlighted rows indicate most efficient models in their class.
The scatter plot reveals the trade-off between speed performance and practicality in EV design. High-performance models like the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT and Tesla Model S Plaid achieve remarkable speeds above 280 km/h but slightly shorter ranges around 470-560 km. Meanwhile, efficiency-oriented sedans such as the Mercedes EQS and Lucid Air exceed 650 km in range by prioritizing aerodynamics and energy optimization. Most mainstream EVs cluster between 180–210 km/h with 450–550 km ranges, illustrating how manufacturers target an optimal equilibrium for everyday usability.
Lucid leads the market with an impressive average range of 603 km, showcasing its advanced battery management and aerodynamic efficiency. Mercedes-Benz follows with 538 km, while Tesla maintains strong performance with an average of 497 km despite smaller battery capacities. Mid-tier brands like Volkswagen and Hyundai balance affordability with solid range figures (around 400–450 km). This comparison highlights how premium automakers leverage larger batteries and refined aerodynamics, whereas mass-market brands focus on efficiency per kilowatt-hour to stay competitive.
The line chart shows that a larger battery doesn't always mean better efficiency. Most efficient EVs stay around 120–145 Wh/km, no matter the battery size. For example, the Hyundai IONIQ 6 reaches 136 Wh/km with a 74 kWh pack. Cars with 85–100 kWh batteries vary the most, ranging from 130 to 190 Wh/km, which suggests that weight, aerodynamics, and powertrain design play a bigger role than battery size. Performance models usually consume more energy because of dual motors and higher power output. Overall, the data suggests the industry is getting close to a practical efficiency limit of about 120 Wh/km.
When examining the top manufacturers by volume, efficiency differences become apparent and reveal competitive advantages in the market.
Tesla averages 127 Wh/km across their lineup, representing best-in-class efficiency. This translates directly to longer range from smaller batteries, reducing vehicle weight and cost.
Traditional automakers show interesting patterns:
The 2025 EV market demonstrates that efficiency, design, and platform choices are just as important as battery size in determining real-world performance and consumer appeal. Insights from the four charts reveal several key takeaways:
Overall Takeaway: Consumers should consider both efficiency and battery capacity when evaluating EVs. A well-designed moderate-capacity EV can outperform larger-battery competitors in real-world range. As the industry continues to innovate, improvements in aerodynamics, weight reduction, and powertrain optimization will make future EVs more efficient, practical, and sustainable across all market segments.